Ben Franklin Fellowship critique of BridgeUSA, by Michael McCarry

The Benjamin Franklin Fellowship, a well-connected group of Foreign Service conservatives, recently issued a report asserting that four short-term visitor programs under the BridgeUSA umbrella should be canceled. The programs are the popular Au Pair, Summer Work and Travel (SWT), Camp Counselor, and Intern visa programs.

BridgeUSA’s website explains that the program “annually attracts around 300,000 individuals to the United States from 200 countries and territories to study in U.S. high schools, universities, and research institutions; build professional networks; enhance English language and intercultural skills; and teach in U.S. schools, colleges, and universities.” The programs are managed by American sponsor organizations and institutions that are approved for this role by the Department of State. The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs oversees and regulates the program.  BridgeUSA receives no appropriated funds.  Depending on the category of activity, program costs are covered by the participant or the host institution.  

Michael McCarry, a member of PDCA's Board of Directors who is expert in these programs, offers his perspective in this blogpost.

The recent critique of four BridgeUSA program categories by the Ben Franklin Fellowship doesn’t resemble the reality of those programs that I experienced as a USIA Foreign Service Officer and later as Executive Director of the Alliance for International Exchange for 21 years. 
 
For those who may be unfamiliar, BridgeUSA (formerly the Exchange Visitor Program) has 14 program categories and receives no appropriated program funding. The programs are funded by participant fees.
 
To respond briefly to the Franklin critiques, focusing on Summer Work and Travel, the largest program:
  1. The programs are ‘taking jobs’ from American youth – A few years ago, when I asked the head of a suburban pool management company how many Americans he employed as lifeguards, he told me, “For our purposes, the American teenager is extinct. They are all interested in summer activities that enhance their future careers, provide college credit, or involve an international adventure. No one wants these jobs.” I’ve heard versions of this comment from many seasonal employers, including amusement parks, ski lodges, and vacation destinations like Cape Cod, the Jersey shore, and Wisconsin Dells.
Another example of filling a labor gap is Branson, Missouri, a town of 12,000 inhabitants in a deep red corner of a red state that daily hosts tens of thousands of visitors to its many tourist attractions during the summer.  I’ve attended meetings of the Branson Chamber of Commerce and met with the mayor, and they rely on Summer Work Travel to fill their seasonal labor shortage. The presence of the students is important enough to Branson that the local Chamber created a “community support group” to help visiting students acclimate, to give them an opportunity to have an informal “host family” to invite them over for occasional dinners, and to provide a fuller understanding of American life and culture. To help students get to and from work, Branson has created an informal ride network. Community support groups exist in most major Summer Work Travel destinations, testifying to the value the students bring to these communities and creating additional opportunities for genuine cultural exchange. 
 
2. There are unacceptable overstay rates – During my time at the Alliance, I led small delegations of exchange sponsors to visit over 60 U.S. embassies and consulates to discuss the programs. Many we visited multiple times. We met with both public diplomacy and consular staffers, and I never saw or heard anything to suggest that the consular corps wasn’t appropriately applying Section 214(b) in its adjudications. The pattern that does emerge is that an increase in overstays will affect the next season’s adjudications.
 
3. Criminal networks exploit these categories for illicit activities – To my knowledge, this has only happened once. During the George W. Bush administration, U.S.-Russia relations hit a particularly low point. Shortly after a Moscow visit by Secretary Rice that turned out to be somewhat challenging, the U.S. embassy invited an Alliance delegation to Moscow.  At that meeting, senior embassy staffers announced their intention to immediately double the size of the Summer Work Travel program, as a start on improving bilateral relations. The Alliance team strenuously objected, arguing that Russia did not possess the civic culture necessary to accommodate a program of that size. After a long discussion, the Embassy decided to proceed with its plan. As we feared, some criminal activity resulted, and was dealt with through an interagency task force. 
 
Some years after the Russia program was cleaned up and reduced to its original size, the Moscow Public Affairs Officer told me that Summer Work Travel had broadened the reach of the Fulbright program by creating a cohort of bright Russian students at regional universities who spoke English well enough to be competitive with Moscow and St. Petersburg students for Fulbright awards. The embassy viewed this outcome as a considerable plus. 
 
4. The programs ‘masquerade’ as cultural exchange – According to a recent Alliance survey, well over 90 per cent of exchange participants recommend the program to friends and family and gain a better understanding of the U.S. while they are here. By federal regulation, the participants in SWT are university students, an elite population in every country in the world. I’m not aware of an SWT alum who became a prime minister, but the program almost certainly attracts participants who will become government officials at all levels, business and community leaders, journalists, teachers, and parents. Giving that large cohort of future leaders an opportunity to live and work in the U.S., and to better understand our country and people, is not a “masquerade.”  It’s genuine public diplomacy, with unique reach.
 
Michael McCarry is a member of PDCA's Board of Directors. He is a retired USIA foreign service officer with overseas assignments in Bangkok, Chiang Mai, and Beijing, where he served as CAO in the immediate post-Tiananmen Square period and negotiated restoration of the Fulbright program after its suspension by China. He also served as staff director for the Educational and Cultural Exchanges bureau. He was Executive Director of the Alliance for International Exchange for 21 years. He is now a consultant with exchange organizations and serves on boards of PDCA, EF Foundation, and Hollings Center for International Dialogue. Prior to joining Foreign Service, he worked as a local journalist in the Chicago suburbs and as a Congressional legislative assistant, and managed a House reelection campaign.